|

|
The Future of Television
by Dr. David Donnelly
We all make predictions. Some of us, however, are
brazen enough to record and preserve them. Often, when
predictions are recorded, they are either self-
consciously preceded by disclaimers or caveats, or they
are couched in qualifications. For example, Bill Gates
prefaces the second edition of his book, The Road Ahead,
by noting that his volume is "meant to be a serious book,
although ten years from now it may not appear that way."
He goes on to state that what he has said in the book
"that turned out to be right will be considered obvious
and what was wrong will be humorous." ( p. xv)
This Web site provides an expanded version of an essay
on the future of television that appears in MASS
COMMUNICATION IN THE INFORMATION AGE (Northport, Ala.:
Vision Press, 1996). The original essay was written back
in 1994, and due to space constraints, it was fairly
brief. This web page includes links, new developments, a
bibliography, conflicting visions, and lots of added
parenthetical thoughts. Any item contained within ( ) is
an added comment. In addition to my periodic updates, I
will also revisit the original essay to record my "hits
and misses." On an annual basis, I'll provide year-end
summations of significant events affecting the television
industry, make amendments and corrective statements, and
offer new predictions.
My year-end comments for 1996 and my current
amalgam of predictions appear at the end of the original
essay or you may jump directly to them.
(NEW NOTE: added 6/98 OK: I haven't added to this
section in a while, but I want to keep it "frozen." Maybe
I'll revisit it 25 years from the original publication
date.)
The Future
of Television: AMENDED ESSAY
by Dr. David Donnelly
Communication media are never truly static. Their technological
base, the way in which they are used, and their role in and impact
on our society are constantly evolving. There are periods in any
medium's development, however, when change is especially dramatic
and significant. Such transformative periods serve to demarcate
stages in the life of a medium and typically elicit discussion
concerning the future direction and fate of the medium. Television
has entered such a phase. Recent and imminent technological advances,
prompted primarily by the increasing digitization within the industry,
government deregulation (to see the potential downside of deregulation
click here)
within the communication field, and changes in the composition
and demands of media audiences, promise to help redefine our understanding
of what television is and does. (See note on
forecasting media.)
In the future, television's traditional role as storyteller to
the masses will remain. The economics of high quality production
and the ubiquity of the medium will ensure that function. (For
a good explanation of the influence of media economics on the
evolution of new media, see W. Russsell Neuman's book The Future
of the Mass Audience, Chapter 5, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991.)
(Those who foresee a quick demise of "broadcasting"
might note that 1996 was a record year for the major TV networks.
Reporting a 12% increase in advertising revenue over 1995, the
networks raked in approximately $13 billion dollars in advertising
revenue in 1996.) However, the fragmentation of the audience and
the specialization in programming that began with the advent of
cable will continue to personalize the medium. Tomorrow's consumers
will have the opportunity to access a far greater variety of material
via an even wider array of distribution schemes. Our televisions
will tap into a global, interconnected, and fairly seamless infrastructure
of wired and wireless networks. (It now seems clear that some
of our sets will be connected to the Internet). In the near
future, we'll use our television sets to access and retrieve new
sorts of programming and information. Such material will be offered
by the existing entrenched providers but will also be available
from a host of new sources. (See
these examples) Our televisions will serve as electronic classrooms,
transaction terminals, electronic news stands, image libraries,
home theaters, play centers. They will be used as information
appliances. In the future, television will be even more omnipresent,
yet the increased choices, selections and uses of television,
will prompt households to utilize their sets in different ways.
As the size and cost of computer chips continue to decline, most
future television sets will undoubtedly become "smarter."
Some forecasters have erred, however, in predicting that televisions
and computers will completely converge, to the point where they
no longer will be separate mediums. While the two technologies
will continue to perform overlapping functions, they also will
continue to perform distinct duties. We do not need a television
to do word processing, nor do we need a computer on our desktop
to display the evening's primetime offerings. Future televisions
will, however, be upgradable; and some consumers may opt to purchase
hybrid machines. (Examples).
Consumers will have a plethora of television peripherals and accessories
from which to choose. Black standardized set-top converter boxes
will go the way of the AT&T standard black telephones of yesterday.
Some viewers will utilize intelligent systems to help them sift
through, monitor, regulate, and control a flood of incoming aural,
visual, and textual information. Some will utilize voice recognition
systems instead of the traditional remote to control their sets.
Consumers will be able to connect their sets with numerous other
devices: printers, image storage and playback devices, game units,
PCs, telephones, fax machines, electronic mailboxes, security
devices, the possibilities and configurations are endless. (Examples)
In the future, some televisions will be very large, with enormous
flat panel , high resolution screens, while some televisions will
be pocket sized and highly personal. (SEE note)
(See also
The next medium). In sum, buying a television set in the future
will in some ways resemble buying an automobile today. Customers
will acquire the make(s), model(s), and options that they need
and desire and that fit within their budget. So just as the content
of TV will be personalized, our future receivers will be customized.
Television has already entered a transitional period,
and some of the developments alluded to above are not
merely hypothetical - they have already begun. Much of the
current hype, however, posits the transformation as
complete and overnight. Even though many changes have
already been set in motion by increased corporate activity
and investment, there are numerous forces that continue to
constrain momentum. (Student Exercise: Can you list
some of these forces?) Change will also come at
different rates for different segments of the population.
For wealthy and adventurous innovators, change will come
relatively fast. For others, change will be relatively
slow and considerably less dramatic.
|